Hebrews 13:4 · Bible study
Hebrews 13:4 Commentary: Study, Marriage, Honor, and God's Judgment
Greek · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Examine whether Hebrews 13:4 states marriage as honorable or exhorts honor, and how God's judgment on sexual sin shapes Christian conduct.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Marriage is to be honored by everyone, and sexual purity within marriage maintained, because God judges sexual immorality.
- Key words: Timios (honorable/precious), koitē (marriage bed), amiantos (undefiled), pornous (sexually immoral), moichous (adulterers).
- Main debate: Indicative (“Marriage is honorable”) vs. imperative (“Let marriage be held in honor”); the imperative reading fits the context and most modern translations.
- Theological theme: God as the creator and judge of marriage; sexual ethics rooted in creation and covenant; the community’s role in upholding holiness.
- Best use: Preaching or teaching on marriage, sexual purity, and the seriousness of sin; also useful in addressing false teachings about asceticism or antinomianism.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Marriage should be honored by all and the marriage bed kept undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterers.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the bed be undefiled; but God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterers.
KJV King James Version 1769
Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Let marriage be had in honor among all, and let the bed be undefiled: for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
honourable is the marriage in all, and the bed undefiled, and whoremongers and adulterers God shall judge.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
[Let] marriage [be held] every way in honour, and the bed [be] undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers will God judge.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Marriage honourable in all, and the bed undefiled. For fornicators and adulterers God will judge.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Honroso es en todos el matrimonio, y el lecho sin mancilla; mas á los fornicarios y á los adúlteros juzgará Dios.
O matrimônio seja honrado entre todos, e o leito conjugal sem contaminação; pois Deus julgará os pecadores sexuais e os adúlteros.
Que le mariage soit honoré de tous, et le lit conjugal exempt de souillure, car Dieu jugera les impudiques et les adultères.
Die Ehe soll ehrlich gehalten werden bei allen und das Ehebett unbefleckt; die Hurer aber und die Ehebrecher wird Gott richten.
Het huwelijk is eerlijk onder allen, en het bed onbevlekt; maar hoereerders en overspelers zal God oordelen.
Sia il matrimonio tenuto in onore da tutti, e sia il talamo incontaminato; poiché Iddio giudicherà i fornicatori e gli adulteri.
Uczciwe jest małżeństwo między wszystkimi i łoże niepokalane; ale wszeteczników i cudzołożników Bóg będzie sądził.
Брак у всех да будет честен и ложе непорочно; блудников же и прелюбодеев судит Бог.
婚姻,人人 都當 尊重,床 也 不可污穢;因為 苟合 行淫的人, 神 必要審判。
Let married life be honoured among all of you and not made unclean; for men untrue in married life will be judged by God.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Hebrews 13:4
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that this verse upholds marriage as a divinely instituted relationship and warns against sexual sin. The main grammatical question is whether the opening phrase is a statement of fact (indicative) or a call to action (imperative). Most modern commentators, including Calvin, Barnes, Vincent, and the Cambridge Bible, read it as an exhortation: “Let marriage be held in honor among all.” They point to the surrounding context in Hebrews 13, where the same imperative mood appears (e.g., verse 5, “Be free from the love of money”). The Greek word timios can mean “precious” or “held in honor,” and the verb estin (“is”) is absent, inviting an implied imperative. On the other hand, the KJV and older translations read it as indicative: “Marriage is honorable in all.” But even those who take the indicative route apply it as a practical exhortation, since the warning about judgment follows. All agree God will judge those who violate the marriage covenant.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Imperative reading: The surrounding context of exhortations (13:1–6), the lack of a copula, and the logical connection with 'gar' (for) lead most modern commentators to read 'Let marriage be held in honor.'
- Indicative reading: Some older translations (KJV) and a minority of interpreters take it as a declarative statement: 'Marriage is honorable in all,' based on the absence of a verb and the parallel with other indicative statements.
What is clear: Marriage is a divinely instituted relationship that deserves honor, and God will judge sexual immorality and adultery.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Marriage as honorable | Christians agree marriage is a God-given institution to be respected, not disparaged. | Some traditions (e.g., Roman Catholic) honor celibacy as a higher calling but affirm marriage as good; others see marriage and singleness as equally honorable vocations. |
| Imperative vs. indicative reading | All agree the verse upholds marriage as honorable in practice. | Traditional Protestant commentators (Calvin, Barnes) read it as an exhortation (“Let marriage be held in honor”); some older translations (KJV) read it as a statement (“Marriage is honorable”). The Greek allows both. |
| Judgment of sexual sin | God will judge sexual immorality and adultery; these sins are serious before God. | Interpretations differ on whether the judgment is exclusively final (eschatological) or includes temporal consequences, and on the possibility of repentance and forgiveness. |
| Clerical celibacy | Marriage is not sinful for clergy. | Roman Catholic Church requires celibacy for priests (with exceptions in Eastern rites); Protestant and Orthodox traditions allow clergy to marry. All appeal to Scripture, including this verse. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The letter to the Hebrews was written to Jewish Christians facing pressure to return to the old covenant or adopt syncretistic teachings. In the first-century Roman world, marriage was often devalued. Among some Jewish groups like the Essenes (and later, Gnostics), marriage was viewed as a lower state, even defiling for the spiritually elite. At the same time, pagan culture treated sexual immorality lightly. Fornication and adultery were common, and only rarely punished by civil courts. The writer of Hebrews counteracts both extremes. He asserts the honor of marriage against those who disparage it, and he warns of divine judgment against those who treat sexual sin as trivial. The phrase “let the bed be undefiled” uses koitē, which can refer to the marriage bed itself or to sexual intercourse. The point is faithfulness within marriage. The conjunction gar (for) in many manuscripts ties the warning directly to the exhortation: marriage is to be honored precisely because God judges the sexually immoral. This verse appears in a section of general ethical instructions (Hebrews 13:1, 6) that includes love, hospitality, care for prisoners, and contentment, virtues that shape the Christian community’s witness.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note a variant: some manuscripts (including Alexandrinus and the Vulgate) read gar (“for”) instead of de (“but”) at the beginning of the second clause. This reading, preferred by Clarke and Gill, ties the warning of judgment directly to the exhortation: “Marriage is honorable … for God will judge the sexually immoral.” The UBS5 gives gar a B rating, meaning the text is almost certain. The meaning is not significantly affected, but gar makes the logical connection explicit: the judgment is the reason to honor marriage.
Reception History
This verse has been a key text in Christian discussions of marriage and celibacy. Early church writers like Tertullian and Augustine used it to affirm marriage against Gnostic deprecation. At the Council of Nicaea (AD 325), the Egyptian bishop Paphnutius cited Hebrews 13:4 to argue against a proposed canon forbidding marriage for priests, successfully defending clerical marriage. During the Reformation, Protestant reformers (Luther, Calvin, and later Wesley) leveraged the verse to reject mandatory celibacy and monastic vows. In Catholic tradition, the verse is read as honoring marriage while maintaining that celibacy is a higher calling for some; both views coexist. The warning about God’s judgment has been used throughout church history to preach against sexual sin, often in connection with other New Testament passages (1 Cor 6:9, 10, Eph 5:5).
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Honor marriage as God’s design. The verse calls every Christian, married or not, to esteem marriage as a gift from God. This counters any teaching that views celibacy as holier or marriage as impurity.
- Keep the marriage bed pure. Faithfulness and purity within marriage reflect Christ’s covenant love. The phrase “undefiled” (ἀμίαντος, amiantos) means untouched by anything that debases or corrupts.
- Expect God’s judgment on sexual sin. Human courts may overlook sexual immorality, but God sees and will hold all accountable. This is a sobering call to repentance and holiness.
Five-point outline
- Marriage is honorable among all. The honor extends to all persons (clergy and laity) and all aspects of the relationship.
- The marriage bed is to be undefiled. This includes both physical faithfulness and the attitude of purity within marriage.
- God will judge fornicators (sexually immoral). The Greek pornous covers all illegitimate sexual intercourse, including premarital sex.
- God will judge adulterers. Adultery directly breaks the marriage covenant and is severely condemned.
- Marriage is a safeguard against sexual sin. Following Calvin, the verse presents marriage as God’s provision to restrain promiscuous desires.
Illustration hooks
- A wedding ring is a visual promise that two people belong to each other. The “bed undefiled” is the invisible ring of trust between spouses.
- In many cultures, marriage is a public commitment that shapes a community’s moral fabric. When honor fades, the community suffers.
- A single person can honor marriage by respecting others’ vows and by valuing the institution even if they never marry.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Does this verse mean that marriage is for everyone? What about those called to singleness?
- How do we talk about sexual sin without shame and without condoning it?
- If God judges sexual sin, how can I or someone I love find forgiveness?
Leading a Discussion
This verse appears in a list of practical commands that close the letter to the Hebrews. The writer grounds everyday ethics in the reality of God’s judgment and grace. As a group, explore how this verse speaks to both married and single believers.
Discussion questions
- Read Hebrews 13:4 carefully. What does it say about how marriage is regarded? Do you think this is a command or a statement of fact? Why does it matter?
- What does “the bed undefiled” mean in practical terms? How does faithfulness in marriage reflect God’s character?
- Why does the writer include a warning about God’s judgment? How does that affect the way we think about sexual sin?
- What cultural pressures in the first century (and today) might make marriage dishonored or the marriage bed defiled?
- How does this verse challenge the idea that celibacy is spiritually superior to marriage? How does it also honor singleness as a calling?
- How can a church community “hold marriage in honor” corporately? What practices or attitudes help?
- What hope does the gospel offer for those who have failed in the area of sexual purity? How does this verse point beyond judgment to grace?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 1:27 | God created man in his own image. In God’s image he created him; male and female he created them. |
| Genesis 1:28 | God blessed them. God said to them, “Be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the sky, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” |
| Genesis 2:21 | Yahweh God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep. As the man slept, he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. |
| Genesis 2:24 | Therefore a man will leave his father and his mother, and will join with his wife, and they will be one flesh. |
| Leviticus 21:13 | “‘He shall take a wife in her virginity. |
| Leviticus 21:15 | He shall not profane his offspring among his people, for I am Yahweh who sanctifies him.’” |
| II Kings 22:14 | So Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam, Achbor, Shaphan, and Asaiah went to Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe (now she lived in Jerusalem in the second quarter); and they talked with her. |
| Psalms 50:16 | But to the wicked God says, “What right do you have to declare my statutes, that you have taken my covenant on your lips, |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke insists marriage is honorable for all people, including clergy, directly opposing the Catholic teaching he calls the "popish tenet" that makes clergy marriage dishonorable and sinful. He adds that the phrase "the bed undefiled" warns against sexual immorality, noting the Greek reading "for" instead of "but" to strengthen the connection: whoremongers and adulterers will face God's judgment.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin argues that the writer calls marriage honorable not as an exhortation to the married or as a concession, but to set it against fornication as the God-given remedy. Since God blesses only the union of husband and wife, any other union is condemned, and the verse warns that God will punish fornicators.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note affirms that marriage carries dignity for every person, not only a select few. It then draws a sharp contrast: those who commit sexual sins face certain judgment from God, a warning that elevates marriage not by condemning an institution but by naming the trespass that defiles it.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill affirms that marriage is honorable for everyone, instituted by God and honored by Christ's presence, and he condemns those who reject it under a pretense of greater holiness. He warns that fornicators and adulterers will face God's judgment, as marriage is meant to prevent such sins.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB reads the verse as an exhortation to treat marriage honorably among all people, not as a general principle about all things. The warning against sexual immorality leads to the point that God judges what human courts miss, so casual immorality will not escape His notice.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange notes that the command for brotherly love to continue assumes this love was already active among the original readers. The exhortation calls for persistence
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent argues the Greek construction turns this into an exhortation, not a statement: "let marriage be held in honor in every respect." His point is that "in all" refers to all aspects of marriage, not all people. God himself will judge violations of the marriage bond.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley insists marriage is honorable for everyone, including clergy, directly opposing the Roman Catholic view that forbids clerical marriage. He dismisses the claim that marital intimacy is merely "licensed whoredom," affirming its purity. He adds that God will judge those who commit sexual sins outside marriage, even if human courts do not.