Ezekiel 20:35 · Bible study
Ezekiel 20:35 Commentary: Wilderness of the Peoples, Judgment and Purification
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does God gather Israel only to bring them into a 'wilderness of the peoples'? A study of divine judgment and purification in Ezekiel 20:35.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God brings Israel into a wilderness of nations to judge and purify them, mirroring the Exodus generation's testing.
- Key words: “Wilderness of the peoples”, a place of exile and discipline; “plead/enter into judgment”, legal confrontation; “face to face”, direct, personal accountability.
- Main debate: Is the wilderness literal (real lands of exile) or metaphorical (a spiritual condition of testing)? Most commentators see it as both (JFB, Calvin).
- Theological theme: God’s sovereignty in judgment and grace; covenant discipline that leads to purification and restoration.
- Best use: A sobering yet hopeful text for understanding God’s painful purposes in seasons of trial and discipline.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
And I will bring you into the wilderness of the nations, where I will enter into judgment with you face to face.
WEB World English Bible 2000
I will bring you into the wilderness of the peoples, and there I will enter into judgment with you face to face.
KJV King James Version 1769
And I will bring you into the wilderness of the people, and there will I plead with you face to face.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
and I will bring you into the wilderness of the peoples, and there will I enter into judgment with you face to face.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And I have brought you in unto the wilderness of the peoples, And have been judged with you there face to face.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
and I will bring you into the wilderness of the peoples, and there will I enter into judgment with you face to face.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And I will bring you into the wilderness of people, and there will I plead with you face to face.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y os he de traer al desierto de pueblos, y allí litigaré con vosotros cara á cara.
E eu vos levarei ao deserto de povos, e ali entrarei em juízo convosco face a face,
Je vous amènerai dans le désert des peuples, et là je vous jugerai face à face.
und will euch bringen in die Wüste der Völker und daselbst mit euch rechten von Angesicht zu Angesicht.
Daartoe zal Ik u brengen in de woestijn der volken, en Ik zal met u aldaar rechten, aangezicht aan aangezicht;
e vi condurrò nel deserto dei popoli, e quivi verrò in giudizio con voi a faccia a faccia;
A prowadząc was po puszczy tych narodów, tam się z wami twarzą w twarz sądzić będę.
И приведу вас в пустыню народов, и там буду судиться с вами лицом к лицу.
我必帶 你們 到 外邦人 的曠野，在那裡 當面 刑罰 你們。
And I will take you into the waste land of the peoples, and there I will take up the cause with you face to face.
Verse in Context
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree: this verse describes a coming judgment that is both severe and purposeful. God will gather His scattered people from the nations (v. 34) but then bring them into a “wilderness of the peoples”, a place of testing and purification. Calvin calls it a “medium between rejection and reconciliation”: not mere punishment, but a discipline that prepares a remnant for restored covenant relationship. The Cambridge Bible sees a direct parallel to the Exodus generation: as God pleaded with the fathers in the literal wilderness of Egypt, so He will plead with their descendants in a new wilderness. Jamieson-Fausset-Brown describes this as a “spiritual wilderness period”, a transition of trial that purges rebels so that the faithful can finally serve the Lord on His holy mountain (v. 40). Keil and Delitzsch add that the language of “strong hand and stretched-out arm” (v. 33-34), normally used for deliverance, is here paired with “wrath poured out,” making this a solemn act of sovereign discipline. The goal is not destruction for its own sake but the separation of the rebellious from the covenant community (v. 38), so that all may know that He is Yahweh.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Literal geographic wilderness: Wesley and Gill take ‘wilderness of the peoples’ as actual desolate regions of exile (Media, Hyrcania) where the exiles suffered; supported by the harsh language of wrath poured out.
- Metaphorical wilderness of discipline: Calvin and JFB read the wilderness as a spiritual state — a time of testing and transition between rejection and restoration; the focus is on the process of purging rebels, not a specific location.
- Eschatological wilderness (future tribulation): JFB and some later interpreters see a full fulfillment in a future period when all Israel will be gathered and judged before entering the land, drawing on Zech 13:8-9 and Dan 12:1.
What is clear: God will personally confront His dispersed people, judge their rebellion, and separate the faithful from the rebels — a pattern He has used before and will use again, always for the sake of His covenant and His name.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of “wilderness of the peoples” | It signifies a place or state of testing, discipline, and purification among the nations, parallel to the Sinai wilderness. | Some (Wesley, Gill) take it as literal inhospitable regions of exile; others (JFB, Calvin) emphasize a metaphorical wilderness, a transitional period of hardship and separation from normal life. |
| Timing of the judgment | The verse refers to a judgment that began with the Babylonian exile and continues in the dispersion of Israel among the nations. | Some see a partial fulfillment in the post-exilic return (Calvin, Cambridge). Others (JFB, Matthew Henry) push the primary fulfillment to a future eschatological period, including a great tribulation and final restoration. |
| Purpose of the judgment | God’s aim is not total destruction but the purging of rebels and the preservation of a faithful remnant. | Reformed commentators (Calvin, Keil) stress the covenant-renewal aspect, the judgment leads to a deeper bond. Others (Gill, Wesley) emphasize the severity of punishment without minimizing the remnant hope. |
| Parallel with Exodus generation | Both are acts of divine judgment and testing in a wilderness setting where God deals directly with His people. | Whether the parallel is strictly punitive (the rebels of both generations die) or more pedagogical (the testing in both cases aims at teaching obedience) is nuanced differently by commentators. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Ezekiel prophesied to Judean exiles in Babylon after 597 BC, a people who had seen their city destroyed and their temple burned. They were scattered among many nations, and some among them had begun to think they could simply assimilate into their host cultures, “We will be as the nations, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone” (Ezek 20:32). The Lord’s response is a forceful claim of kingship: “surely with a mighty hand … and with wrath poured out, I will be king over you” (v. 33).
The “wilderness of the peoples” echoes the Exodus narrative. Israel’s first wilderness testing lasted forty years and led to an entire generation perishing for unbelief (Num 14:26-35). Now God announces a second wilderness, not the literal Sinai desert but a “wilderness of the peoples,” the world of the nations where the exiles are scattered. Calvin notes that after the return from Babylon, the land itself lay desolate “as if they were banished to an obscure corner of the world.” Wesley and Gill read the phrase as the “most horrid parts of the world”, the mountainous regions of Media, Hyrcania, and Scythia, places of hardship that would mirror the suffering of the first wilderness.
The metaphor is not only geographical but theological. The wilderness in Israel’s tradition is where God meets His people in both judgment and provision. It is a place with no distractions, where the heart is revealed. God says He will plead with them “face to face”, a courtroom image of direct accountability. This underscores that the judgment is not arbitrary but a matter of covenant dispute, as Jeremiah 2:9 describes: “I will yet contend with you, says Yahweh, and with your children’s children.”
Textual Notes
No significant textual variants are noted in the supplied sources for Ezekiel 20:35. The Hebrew text is stable, and the LXX and Vulgate render the verse without substantial differences. Some manuscripts show minor variations in word order, but these do not affect the meaning.
Reception History
Ezekiel 20:35 has been read through the lens of both judgment and restoration. Early Jewish exegesis (including the Targum, cited by Gill) understood the “face to face” plea as an act of public vengeance, emphasizing God’s vindication. The early church saw in the wilderness a type of the Church’s sojourn in the world, a place of testing that separates true believers from mere professors. The Reformation commentators (Calvin, Geneva Bible) used the verse to argue for God’s sovereign discipline over His covenant people, without national boundaries. In more recent evangelical interpretation, the passage is often cited in discussions of Israel’s future restoration (JFB, Scofield), with the wilderness representing the tribulation period that purges the nation before the millennium. Across these eras, the verse has consistently been seen as both a warning against complacency and a promise that God’s judgment is never aimless, it serves His holy name and the ultimate good of His people.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Gathering into the wilderness, God asserts His kingship over a scattered people. He will not let them simply disappear among the nations. The gathering itself is an act of sovereign grace, but it leads to a place of testing (vv. 33-35).
- The issue is joined face to face, The “pleading” is a legal metaphor. God brings His covenant case directly against His people. No more mediated judgment through foreign nations; now He deals with them personally, just as He did in the wilderness of Egypt (v. 36).
- The goal: purification, not destruction, The rebels are purged (v. 38), but the remnant is brought into the bond of the covenant (v. 37). The wilderness is a crucible that separates true worship from idolatry, leading to renewed worship on God’s holy mountain (v. 40).
Five-point outline
- God’s sovereignty over the nations, He will not let Israel assimilate (v. 32-33).
- Gathering from dispersion, an act that looks like deliverance but carries a warning (v. 34).
- Leading into the wilderness of the peoples, a place of exposure and testing (v. 35a).
- Entering into judgment face to face, personal accountability for covenant unfaithfulness (v. 35b).
- Parallel with the Exodus generation, the pattern of rebellion, judgment, and a faithful remnant (v. 36-38).
Illustration hooks
- A family’s move to a remote area. Parents relocate the children to a simpler place, not as punishment but to reset priorities and address deep issues.
- Medical isolation for treatment. A patient is brought into a sterile ward, separated from the normal life, not to harm but to heal, sometimes through painful procedures.
- An athlete’s training camp. The coach removes the athlete from distractions to a place of intensive discipline, where weakness is exposed and strength built.
Questions your congregation is asking
- If God loves me, why does the path He leads me on feel like a wilderness?
- How do I know if my hardships are discipline for sin or just ordinary suffering?
- Does God’s judgment mean He has rejected me, or is He still working for my good?
Leading a Discussion
This passage confronts us with a God who will not let His people drift into comfortable assimilation. He acts to gather, to isolate, and to judge, always with the goal of purifying a people for Himself. As you discuss, notice how God’s “face to face” plea is both terrifying and intimate. He does not abandon the covenant; He insists on it.
Discussion questions
- Read Ezekiel 20:32-38. What did the people think they could do, and how does God respond? Why is their plan so dangerous?
- The phrase “wilderness of the peoples” is unusual. How do the commentators (Calvin, JFB, Gill) explain what this wilderness is? What difference does it make whether it is literal or metaphorical?
- How does God’s “mighty hand and stretched-out arm” (v. 33-34) normally function in the Old Testament? Why is it unsettling that these deliverance words are paired with “wrath poured out”?
- The verse says God will “plead” or “enter into judgment” face to face. What does this courtroom language add to our understanding of God’s character? (See also Jeremiah 2:9).
- Compare this wilderness judgment with the Exodus generation (v. 36). What did that earlier judgment accomplish? How is this new judgment both similar and different?
- Look at the result in verses 37-38: passing under the rod and purging rebels. What kind of “covenant bond” is this? Does God force obedience, or is something else at work?
- How can this passage speak to a believer who feels “in the wilderness” today? What hope does it offer that God’s judgment is not the final word?
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Jeremiah 2:9 | “Therefore I will yet contend with you,” says Yahweh, “and I will contend with your children’s children. |
| Jeremiah 2:35 | “Yet you said, ‘I am innocent. Surely his anger has turned away from me.’ “Behold, I will judge you, because you say, ‘I have not sinned.’ |
| Jeremiah 25:31 | A noise will come even to the end of the earth; for Yahweh has a controversy with the nations. He will enter into judgment with all flesh. As for the wicked, he will give them to the sword,”’ says Yahweh.” |
| Ezekiel 17:20 | I will spread my net on him, and he will be taken in my snare. I will bring him to Babylon, and will enter into judgment with him there for his trespass that he has trespassed against me. |
| Ezekiel 19:13 | Now it is planted in the wilderness, in a dry and thirsty land. |
| Ezekiel 20:36 | Just as I entered into judgment with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so I will enter into judgment with you,” says the Lord Yahweh. |
| Ezekiel 38:8 | After many days you will be visited. In the latter years you will come into the land that is brought back from the sword, that is gathered out of many peoples, on the mountains of Israel, which have been a continual waste; but it is brought out of the peoples and they will dwell securely, all of them. |
| Ezekiel 38:22 | I will enter into judgment with him with pestilence and with blood. I will rain on him, on his hordes, and on the many peoples who are with him, torrential rains with great hailstones, fire, and sulfur. |
Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke reads the promised return to their own land as a sobering homecoming: the land itself has become a wilderness because of their sins. There God will rule them directly, and His justice and mercy will either destroy or reform them.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin stresses that God's purpose in bringing Israel out of Chaldaea was not a fresh display of favor but a judgment. He would lead them into a wilderness, just as he did their fathers, where they would live isolated and miserable rather than restored to their land.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible commentary emphasizes that the driving force behind all of Israel's history, past and future, is Jehovah's concern for his own name. Their restoration comes not because they deserve it, but so that God's name is honored among the nations, leading them to finally recognize him and loathe their own sin.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note emphasises that the "wilderness of the people" refers not to a literal desert but to a place among the nations where God will directly confront Israel. This face-to-face pleading is a severe but disciplinary judgment, not a final abandonment. God brings His people into this public arena to settle accounts.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill reads this as a prophecy of the Jews' ongoing dispersion among the nations, especially within the Roman empire, which he compares to a wilderness. There God confronts them publicly with judgment, taking vengeance on them face to face, as the Targum puts it.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB distinguishes the "wilderness of the peoples" from the literal wilderness of Egypt, treating it as a spiritual state of trial and discipline while Israel is scattered among the nations. He sees partial fulfillment in the return from Cyrus but reserves the full, final fulfillment for a future period when rebels will be purged from among them. The image of pleading is legal: God meets them face to face as a plaintiff with a defendant.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch argue that God's judgment is not a physical gathering from Babylon but a spiritual severing of Israel from the heathen. The "desert of the nations" is a figure for the world where God will discipline them. He will make them pass under the shepherd's rod, bringing them into the covenant's discipline, not a new covenant.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange highlights that God's judgment on Israel included giving them "statutes that were not good," such as the pagan practice of child sacrifice, as a penal consequence for their idolatry. This reveals how persistent rebellion provokes God to hand people over to destructive practices, making sin its own punishment.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley reads "bring you" as "drive you" and identifies "the wilderness" as the most desolate parts of the known world, naming specific mountainous regions. For him, God's "plead with you" is not a trial but a sentence already passed and immediately carried out on the people.