Deuteronomy 28:57 Meaning: The Deepest Hunger
toward her young one who comes out from between her feet, and toward her children whom she bears; for she will eat them secretly for lack of all things in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy will distress you in your gates.
And toward her young one that cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children which she shall bear: for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and straitness, wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates.
and toward her young one that cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children whom she shall bear; for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly, in the siege and in the distress wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates.
and against her seed which cometh out from between her feet, even against her sons whom she doth bear, for she doth eat them for the lacking of all things in secret, in the siege and in the straitness with which thine enemy doth straiten thee within thy gates.
because of her afterbirth which hath come out between her feet, and her children whom she shall bear; for she shall secretly eat them for want of everything in the siege and in the straitness wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates.
Meaning in one sentence
Explore Deuteronomy 28:57's graphic siege imagery as a warning of covenant consequences, and how it points us toward the life God offers.
Context
Deuteronomy 28 divides into two stark sections: blessings for obeying God’s covenant, and curses for abandoning it. By the time you reach verse 57, Moses has described a long, escalating series of disasters. Enemy armies surround Israel’s cities. Food runs out. The people grow so desperate that normal human bonds collapse. Moses includes these extreme images not to frighten for its own sake, but to make clear that turning from God unravels everything life depends on. The covenant is not a casual suggestion, it is the fabric that holds community, family, and even basic humanity together.
Key Words
Two Hebrew words carry the weight of this verse. Shilyah (afterbirth) is the membrane that surrounds a baby in the womb. It is something no one would normally even look at, much less eat. Yet the text says a mother will eat it, as well as her own children, because of choser, the utter lack of everything. That word, choser, means total want, and it appears in the nearby curses too (Deuteronomy 28:48). Hunger like that erases all taboo.
The word for “eat” is akhal, the same verb used for ordinary meals. That is part of the horror: the same mouth that would nurse a child now consumes it. The siege (matsor) and distress (matsoq) squeeze normal life into something unrecognizable. These words remind us how desperately we need God’s provision, not just bread, but the mercy that keeps our hearts from turning against one another.
How Christians Read This Verse
Christians across traditions have read this verse as a sobering historical warning. Adam Clarke calls its images “the deepest distress,” noting that no words more powerfully depict the miseries of siege. The Cambridge Bible reads the curse as a prediction of what Israel actually endured because of their failure to serve God. Matthew Henry points to the nation’s later history, sieges by Babylon and Rome, as terrible fulfillments. Other commentators, like John Wesley, emphasize that this kind of devastation follows when a people is abandoned by God. All agree the verse is not literal in every case but shows the extreme end of covenant breaking.
A common misunderstanding
Some readers think God threatens to actively force a mother to eat her children, as if He takes pleasure in cruelty. In fact, the curse describes what happens when God withdraws His protection and allows the natural consequences of invasion and hunger to take their course. The enemy brings the siege; the lack of food drives the desperation. The verse is a warning about what life looks like without God’s sheltering hand, not a portrait of God’s character.
Living This Out
You and I will never face a siege like this. But we do face smaller choices every day about where we place our trust. When you are afraid of losing something, money, health, a relationship, do you cling tighter to God or to whatever seems to offer control? This verse asks you to look at the end of that road: a life built on anything but God eventually runs empty. Let the horror here push you toward honest dependence. And remember the good news: Jesus endured the full curse on the cross (Galatians 3:13). He went into the deepest hunger so you could be fed.
Main takeaway: Breaking covenant with the living God leads to a desolation that destroys even the most natural human bonds, but the gospel offers a way back to life.
For Families
For ages 5, 8
God promised to take care of His people if they obeyed Him. But He warned them that if they turned away, very bad things would happen. This verse reminds us that listening to God keeps us safe and close to Him.
For ages 9, 12
In the Bible, God made a covenant with Israel, a promise with blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience. This verse describes one of the worst curses: a mother being so hungry during an enemy siege that she would eat her own children. It sounds terrible because it is terrible. God wanted His people to see how serious it is to turn away from Him. But the whole Bible also shows God’s plan to send Jesus, who took the curse for us so we could be forgiven and brought back into God’s family.
Questions People Ask
Is Deuteronomy 28:57 meant to be taken literally?
Most Christian interpreters read this as a literal description of what can happen in the extreme conditions of a prolonged siege. History records such horrors during the Roman siege of Jerusalem in AD 70. The language is deliberately graphic to make the point unmistakable: turning from God leads to a unraveling so complete that even natural instincts vanish.
Did this actually happen in Israel’s history?
Yes. Both the Babylonian siege (586 BC) and the Roman siege (AD 70) produced accounts of mothers eating their children. The historian Josephus describes such events during the Roman war. The curses of Deuteronomy 28 were tragically fulfilled, showing that God’s warnings were real.
Does this verse mean God is cruel?
No. The verse describes the consequence of the people’s choice to abandon God, not God’s active cruelty. God’s character is consistent throughout Scripture: He is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love (Exodus 34:6). The curses are the logical result of rejecting the source of life, like a person cutting themselves off from food and water.
How should Christians today apply this Old Testament curse?
Christians are not under the Old Testament theocratic covenant that promised land and national blessings for obedience. But the principle remains: sin has consequences that can dismantle families and communities. This verse warns us to take our relationship with God seriously, and it points us to Jesus, who bore the full curse for us so we could receive the full blessing of God’s forgiveness.
Why is the imagery so graphic?
The graphic nature is intentional. The covenant with God is not trivial; it is a matter of life and death. By making the curses visceral and shocking, Moses impresses on Israel the seriousness of their commitment. Language that is too gentle would not match the weight of the stakes involved.
For pastors & researchers
Hebrew interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study