Deuteronomy 28:38 · Bible study
Deuteronomy 28:38 Commentary: Locust Curse and God's Sovereignty
Hebrew · 6 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
This verse from Deuteronomy's covenant curses warns that locusts will consume the harvest, showing God's control over nature as a response to disobedience.
Research Summary
- Meaning: This curse warns that disobedience leads to agricultural failure, showing God uses locusts to judge covenant-breaking.
- Key words: Seed (zera) = what is sown; little (me'at) = scarcity; locust (arbeh) = a swarming insect, God's instrument.
- Main debate: Whether these curses apply directly today or were specific to Israel's covenant; both sides see a principle of God's sovereignty.
- Teological theme: God's control over nature for both blessing and judgment; human labor is futile without His blessing.
- Best use: As a warning against complacency, a call to examine our obedience, and a reminder that God uses all things to lead us to repentance.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
You will sow much seed in the field but harvest little, because the locusts will consume it.
WEB World English Bible 2000
You will carry much seed out into the field, and will gather little in, for the locust will consume it.
KJV King James Version 1769
Thou shalt carry much seed out into the field, and shalt gather but little in; for the locust shall consume it.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Thou shalt carry much seed out into the field, and shalt gather little in; for the locust shall consume it.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
`Much seed thou dost take out into the field, and little thou dost gather in, for the locust doth consume it;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Thou shalt carry much seed out into the field, and shalt gather little in; for the locust shall devour it.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Thou shalt cast much seed into the ground, and gather little: because the locusts shall consume all.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Sacarás mucha simiente al campo, y cogerás poco; porque la langosta lo consumirá.
Tirarás muito semente ao campo, e colherás pouco; porque os gafanhotos o consumirão.
Tu transporteras sur ton champ beaucoup de semence; et tu feras une faible récolte, car les sauterelles la dévoreront.
Du wirst viel Samen ausführen auf das Feld, und wenig einsammeln; denn die Heuschrecken werden's abfressen.
Gij zult veel zaads op den akker uitbrengen, maar gij zult weinig inzamelen; want de sprinkhaan zal het verteren.
Porterai molta semenza al campo e raccoglierai poco, perché la locusta la divorerà.
Nasienia wiele wyniesiesz na pole, a mało zbierzesz; bo to pożre szarańcza.
Семян много вынесешь в поле, а соберешь мало, потому что поест их саранча.
你帶 到田間 的種子 雖多，收進來的 卻少，因為 被蝗蟲 吃了。
You will take much seed out into the field, and get little in; for the locust will get it.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Deuteronomy 28:38
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that this verse forms part of the covenant curses in Deuteronomy 28, where God warns Israel of the consequences of disobedience. Calvin emphasizes that locusts are 'innumerable ministers' of God's wrath, sent to destroy the harvest and bring famine. He connects the locust to other insects in Joel 1:4, arguing that such creatures never trouble people except by God's command. Gill points to Joel 1:4 and Haggai 1:9 as parallels, affirming that the locust is a 'great destroyer' used by God. The Cambridge Bible notes that the curses correspond to the blessings, and that locusts are part of a detailed antithesis. The consensus is clear: this verse reveals God's sovereign control over nature. Even a swarm of locusts serves His purpose of judgment when His people break covenant.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The verse clearly describes agricultural failure caused by locusts as a covenantal consequence of disobedience.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Application of the curse today | The verse is a historical warning for Israel under the covenant. | Some Christians see it as directly applicable today (God may use natural disasters as punishment); others see it as part of the old covenant fulfilled in Christ, so believers are freed from the curse (Galatians 3:13), though we still suffer consequences of sin. |
| Nature of locusts as agents | Locusts are under God's sovereignty; they are not random. | Whether God actively sends locusts as personal judgment each time they appear, or whether this is a general principle of the covenant that shows the moral dimension of created order. |
| Hope of restoration | Repentance restores relationship with God. | Does this verse imply automatic restoration of material blessings, or is the focus on spiritual restoration and eternal hope? |
Historical & Cultural Context
This verse sits within the second half of Deuteronomy 28, the catalogue of curses that mirror the blessings in the first half (vv.1-14). The structure follows ancient Near Eastern treaty patterns, where blessings and curses are the sanctions of the covenant. Agriculture was the economic backbone of ancient Israel; a failed harvest meant hunger, debt, and vulnerability to enemies.
Locust plagues were a well-known disaster across the ancient Near East. The Exodus account (Exodus 10:14-15) describes locusts darkening the land and consuming every green thing. The prophet Joel later used locusts as a metaphor for God's judgment army (Joel 2:3-25). In Deuteronomy 28:38, the curse reverses the blessing of abundant harvest (Deut 28:11-12). The phrasing 'carry much seed out into the field' and 'gather little in' highlights the futility of labor when God's hand is against His people.
The surrounding verses escalate the curse: failure of vineyards (v.39), olive trees (v.40), and even children going into captivity (v.41). The locust (אַרְבֶּה, arbeh) was a specific swarming insect; its swarms could strip fields in hours. The verse teaches that no human effort succeeds apart from God's blessing, and that creation itself can become an instrument of judgment against covenant unfaithfulness.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for this verse. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscripts. The cross-references to Joel and Amos confirm consistent use of locust imagery throughout the Old Testament.
Reception History
This verse has been received primarily as a stark warning about covenant disobedience. The prophet Joel echoes its language to call Judah to repentance, describing locust swarms as God's army (Joel 2:3,25). In the Reformation, John Calvin used it to argue that natural disasters are sent by God to punish sin and call people to repentance. He specifically connects the locust to Joel 1:4 and insists that such insects 'never trouble us except by God's command.' Early church fathers saw the curse as pointing forward to Christ, who bore the curse for us (Galatians 3:13). In modern pastoral care, the verse addresses the frustration of failed efforts while speaking to God's ultimate sovereignty and the hope of restoration.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Human effort is not enough. The farmer sows much seed, but the harvest is little. Our labor depends on God's provision; without His blessing, the best efforts turn to dust.
- God commands creation. The locust is not a random accident. It obeys God's call, as the plague in Egypt and the prophecy of Joel show. Natural disasters have a moral dimension in covenant context.
- Judgment points to repentance. The curse is not God's last word. Joel promises restoration after the locust plague (Joel 2:25). The warning is meant to turn hearts back to God.
Five-point outline
- Blessing reversed: Deuteronomy 28:8-12 promised abundance; verse 38 shows locusts consuming the harvest, undoing every blessing.
- God's sovereignty over pests: Calvin calls locusts 'satellites' of God. They are not independent agents but servants of His will.
- Futility of labor without God: The farmer works hard, carrying seed, sowing, but the locust undoes it all. This mirrors the curse on Adam (Genesis 3:17-19) where the ground resists.
- Call to examine obedience: These curses were given so Israel would know why hardship came. They remove the mystery: suffering has a cause in covenant unfaithfulness.
- Glimmer of grace: The same God who sends locusts can restore (Joel 2:25). The curse is not permanent; it is a summons to return.
Illustration hooks
- A farmer works all season, fertilizing, irrigating, weeding. Then a pest outbreak destroys the crop. The effort was real; the loss is bitter. What do we say to that farmer?
- You spend years building a business, raising a family, or serving a church. Then an economic downturn or unexpected crisis undoes much of it. The frustration echoes this verse: 'much seed, little harvest.'
- Children ask why God lets bad things happen when we try our best. Deuteronomy 28 gives a framework: sometimes hardship is not random but is God's loving discipline.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Does God still send natural disasters as punishment today?
- How do I know if my struggles are a consequence of my sin or just part of living in a fallen world?
- Can a Christian experience these kinds of curses under the new covenant?
Leading a Discussion
This verse is a hard one. It describes a farmer doing everything right, sowing much seed, but reaping almost nothing because of locusts. The text says this is a curse from God for breaking the covenant. In a small group, we can explore what this teaches about God, human effort, and the seriousness of our relationship with Him.
Discussion questions
- Read Deuteronomy 28:38 in its context (vv. 15-46). What pattern do you see in how the curses are structured?
- Why do you think locusts are singled out as an instrument of judgment? What does this imply about God's control over creation?
- How does the farmer's experience in this verse compare to the blessings in Deuteronomy 28:11-12?
- Calvin wrote that locusts are 'innumerable ministers' of God. Do you find that comforting or troubling? Why?
- In what ways do we today experience 'sowing much but gathering little'? This could be in work, relationships, or spiritual life.
- How does the New Testament reframe the connection between suffering and sin? (See John 9:1-3, Romans 8:28).
- What hope does this passage offer, if any? Look at Joel 2:25 as a cross-reference.
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Exodus 10:14 | The locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the borders of Egypt. They were very grievous. Before them there were no such locusts as they, nor will there ever be again. |
| Exodus 10:15 | For they covered the surface of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened, and they ate every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees which the hail had left. There remained nothing green, either tree or herb of the field, through all the land of Egypt. |
| Isaiah 5:10 | For ten acres of vineyard shall yield one bath, and a homer of seed shall yield an ephah.” |
| Joel 1:4 | What the swarming locust has left, the great locust has eaten. What the great locust has left, the grasshopper has eaten. What the grasshopper has left, the caterpillar has eaten. |
| Joel 2:3 | A fire devours before them, and behind them, a flame burns. The land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them, a desolate wilderness. Yes, and no one has escaped them. |
| Joel 2:25 | I will restore to you the years that the swarming locust has eaten, the great locust, the grasshopper, and the caterpillar, my great army, which I sent among you. |
| Amos 4:9 | “I struck you with blight and mildew many times in your gardens and your vineyards, and the swarming locusts have devoured your fig trees and your olive trees; yet you haven’t returned to me,” says Yahweh. |
| Amos 7:1 | Thus the Lord Yahweh showed me: behold, he formed locusts in the beginning of the shooting up of the latter growth; and behold, it was the latter growth after the king’s harvest. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
5 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin argues that insect plagues are not random natural events but God's appointed ministers of judgment on lawbreakers. He contrasts this with natural philosophy, insisting that such creatures trouble us only by God's command. The faithful must see the locust and worm as visible evidence of divine curse.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible commentary observes that the curses here do not simply reverse the earlier blessings but expand into far greater detail, covering diseases, crop failure and exile. Some verses appear to be later additions that elaborate beyond the original contrast pattern, and the section may originally have ended earlier.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The note points out the frustrating result of God's curse on the disobedient: a farmer sows plentifully but reaps almost nothing because locusts devour the entire crop. The emphasis falls on the complete futility of human effort when divine judgment is at work.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill stresses that this warning describes conditions the Israelites faced while still living in their own land before the Babylonian exile, not their circumstances during captivity itself. The locust, singled out as the destroyer, blights the crop so that a plentiful sowing yields only a meager harvest.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange sees the exhaustive listing of every blessing and curse as deliberate—it proves that nothing in life is accident or human achievement, but God directly rules every particular. For him religion here is not knowledge or worship but daily experience, one day teaching another. This moral framing strips earthly prosperity of its attraction and gives suffering its purpose toward repentance.