Deuteronomy 25:14 · Bible study
Deuteronomy 25:14 Commentary: The Prohibition of Dishonest Measures
Hebrew · 8 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does God forbid possessing two different measures? This study explores the deeper call to integrity in private commercial life from Deuteronomy 25:14.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The command forbids possessing two different measures to prevent cheating in trade; integrity extends to the private sphere.
- Key words: Ephah (a dry measure of grain); the repetition “an ephah and an ephah” stresses the contrast between large and small.
- Main debate: Little dispute exists on the meaning; discussion focuses on whether the law is restricted to literal measures or applies to any form of commercial fraud.
- Theological theme: God's justice demands that his people mirror his character even in mundane economic transactions.
- Best use: Teaching on business ethics, covenant community, and the holiness of everyday life.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
You shall not have two differing measures in your house, one large and one small.
WEB World English Bible 2000
You shall not have in your house diverse measures, one large and one small.
KJV King James Version 1769
Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Thou shalt not have in thy house diverse measures, a great and a small.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Thou hast not in thy house an ephah and an ephah, a great and a small.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Thou shalt not have in thy house divers ephahs, a great and a small.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Neither shall there be in thy house a greater bushel and a less.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
No tendrás en tu casa epha grande y epha pequeño.
Não terás em tua casa efa grande e efa pequeno.
Tu n’ auras point dans ta maison deux sortes d’épha, un grand et un petit.
und in deinem Hause soll nicht zweierlei Scheffel, groß und klein, sein.
Gij zult in uw huis geen tweeerlei efa hebben, een grote en een kleine.
Non avrai in casa due misure, una grande e una piccola.
Nie będziesz też miał w domu twoim dwojakiego korca, większego i mniejszego.
в доме твоем не должна быть двоякая ефа, большая и меньшая;
你家裡 不可 有 一大 一小 兩樣的 升斗。
Or in your house different measures, a great and a small.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Deuteronomy 25:14
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree: this verse forbids the possession, not just the use, of two different measures. Adam Clarke notes the literal reading is “an ephah and an ephah”, one large to buy with, one small to sell by, calling it a practice found among “knaves in all ages.” The Cambridge Bible connects the law to the religious motive that weights and measures are “Jehovah’s and his work” (Proverbs 16:11). Keil & Delitzsch observe that the prohibition extends beyond the marketplace to the home: even having the two measures in the house is wrong, because the opportunity to cheat provokes sin. This is not merely a rule about trade; it is a command to guard integrity at the most private, preparatory level. The law’s severity, calling such practices an “abomination to Yahweh” (v.16), shows God’s deep concern that his people reflect his justice in every transaction, not just when they are being watched.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: It is clear that God forbids possessing dishonest measures because he values integrity in every area of life, especially in commercial dealings where the vulnerable may be cheated.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Possession vs. use | All sources agree the prohibition includes having dishonest measures at home, not just using them in the market. | No real debate; the plain meaning is accepted across traditions. |
| Scope of the command | Christians agree it condemns commercial fraud and calls for integrity. | Some interpret it as a specific Israelite civil law; others apply it as a universal ethical principle for all believers. |
| Relationship to surrounding verses (vv.17-19 on Amalek) | All note that vv.17-19 follow the commercial commands, contrasting righteous dealing with Amalek's treachery. | Whether this connection is intended as a contrast or a separate tradition is debated by source critics. |
| Abomination language | The term marks dishonest trade as a serious covenant violation. | No clear debate; all see it as strong condemnation. |
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, honest trade depended on reliable standards. The ephah was a dry measure of about 20, 40 liters (roughly 9 imperial gallons), used for grain and other commodities. Merchants typically carried weights, stones or metal, in a bag at the belt (Micah 6:11). Possessing two sets, one heavy (for buying) and one light (for selling), allowed the seller to undercut the customer without obvious detection. The law targets not only the act but the possession, because the temptation to use them was near if they were kept at hand.
This specific prohibition sits within a series of laws in Deuteronomy 25 addressing fair dealing. Verses 13, 16 form a unit that begins with “diverse weights” (stones) and then “diverse measures” (ephahs). The surrounding context includes instructions on levirate marriage (vv.5, 10) and violence between men (vv.11, 12), but the commercial commands interrupt that sequence. The Cambridge Bible notes that a positive command to have a single standard may have been inserted later (v.15), yet the core warning remains: the one who cheats defiles the community. The religious motive is strong: “all who do unrighteousness are an abomination to Yahweh your God” (v.16).
Comparable laws appear in Leviticus 19:35, 36 and are echoed by the prophets, Amos 8:5 condemns making “the ephah small and the shekel great,” and Micah 6:10, 11 denounces “scant measure.” The law thus embedded honesty in Israel’s covenant identity. Even today, the verse challenges believers to examine whether their private practices, recordkeeping, pricing, quality promises, match the public face they show.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Deuteronomy 25:14. The Masoretic Text reads uniformly, and ancient versions (LXX, Syriac, Targum) preserve the same sense. The repetition of “ephah” is consistent across witnesses.
Reception History
Throughout church history, this verse has been consistently read as a divine mandate for commercial honesty. Early church fathers, such as John Chrysostom and Augustine, used it to condemn fraud among Christians. The rabbinic tradition amplified the law, requiring that weights and measures be inspected at set intervals. The Reformation commentators, Matthew Henry, John Gill, and the Geneva Bible, emphasized that God's abhorrence of deceit applies to every trade. In modern times, the verse is often cited in Christian ethics resources on business integrity, serving as a reminder that the smallest dishonest practice is an offence to God. The broader principle, that private preparations for cheating are as culpable as the act itself, continues to speak to believers across traditions.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The prohibition includes possession, not just use. The law targets the root of temptation: what we keep at home can shape what we do in public.
- Dishonest measures violate God's character. God is just; his people must reflect his justice in every detail of commerce.
- Integrity brings God's promise of life. Verse 15 links just weights with long days in the land, honesty is not just moral but life-giving.
Five-point outline
- Context: A series of laws on relationships, ending with a command against commercial fraud.
- The specific sin: Possessing two sizes of the same measure, one to buy, one to sell.
- The broader principle: God cares about the private sphere where cheating is planned.
- The motive: Such practices are an “abomination” because they break covenant community.
- The promise: Righteous dealing leads to God's blessing and long tenure in the land.
Illustration hooks
- A baker who uses two sets of measuring cups, one for her own ingredients, one for customers, showing the gap between private standard and public practice.
- A carpenter who builds with slightly shorter lumber for a job but wouldn't accept that from a supplier. The small difference is a large betrayal.
- Online sellers who misrepresent product quality in photos while insisting on honest payment. Modern “diverse measures” are just a click away.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Does this verse apply to my daily work if I'm not in retail or trade?
- What about “small” dishonesties, rounding up hours, fudging expense reports?
- How can I cultivate integrity when the culture around me treats cheating as normal?
Leading a Discussion
This law, buried in the middle of Deuteronomy, speaks directly to how we handle money and goods when no one is watching. It warns against having two sets of measures, one for gain, one for giving. As you consider this text, let it search your own habits of fairness and honesty, both in public and in private.
Discussion questions
- Read Deuteronomy 25:13, 16. Why does the law forbid even having diverse weights and measures, not just using them?
- What does the word “abomination” (v.16) tell you about God's view of commercial dishonesty?
- Compare this command with Amos 8:5 and Micah 6:10, 11. How do the prophets apply the same principle?
- In what areas of your life might you be tempted to “keep two measures”, one for yourself and one for others?
- How does the promise of long days in the land connect justice with blessing? Is this always immediate?
- How can we help each other stay honest in workplaces or markets that reward cutting corners?
- What practical step could you take this week to align your private practices with God's call to integrity?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
7 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the original Hebrew literally says "an ephah and an ephah" — two different ephahs used to cheat: a large one for buying from others, a small one for selling your own goods. He observes that such dishonest dealers have existed in every age and nation.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes contrasts this command to destroy the Amalekites with the spirit of the New Testament. He notes that the Law aimed at showing God’s hatred of sin by removing obstinate enemies, not at overcoming hostility through love and conversion as Jesus later taught.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentary notes that the positive command for a single standard of weights is likely an interpolation, breaking the natural connection between the paired prohibitions. It also observes that the religious motivation differs from the parallel in Leviticus, suggesting the two laws may have arisen independently.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note warns that even owning two different sets of measures in your house invites dishonesty. A believer must not keep a larger measure for buying and a smaller one for selling, as this is a deliberate tool for cheating. Integrity demands one honest standard.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill explains that the command against having diverse measures in the house forbids using two different sets—a large one for buying and a small one for selling. This practice would cheat both the seller and the buyer in turn, a fraud the prophet Amos later condemns.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch draw attention to the specific phrase "stone and stone" in the law, explaining it means two sets of weights: large ones for buying and small ones for selling, a calculated fraud. They also note that the closing words in the passage serve as a comprehensive summary of all lawbreaking.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that the law forbids not just using dishonest weights and measures, but even keeping them in the house, because possession itself would invite temptation to cheat. The standard of justice must itself be just, or it becomes a constant fraud.