II Samuel 9:1 · Bible study
2 Samuel 9:1 Commentary: Kindness for Jonathan's Sake
Hebrew · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore David's inquiry for Saul's house, covenant faithfulness, timing, and the kindness of God in II Samuel 9:1.
Research Summary
- Meaning: David seeks a descendant of Saul to honor his covenant with Jonathan by showing covenantal kindness (chesed).
- Key words: Yesh (H3426, 'is there'), chesed (H2617, 'covenant loyalty'), ba'avur (H5668, 'for the sake of').
- Main debate: Why David waited so long, due to preoccupation with war (Gill) or neglect later corrected (Henry).
- Theological theme: Covenant faithfulness that mirrors God's 'kindness of God' (v. 3) to the undeserving.
- Best use: A narrative of grace, promise-keeping, and the reversal of human expectations.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Then David asked, “Is there anyone left from the house of Saul to whom I can show kindness for the sake of Jonathan?”
WEB World English Bible 2000
David said, “Is there yet any who is left of Saul’s house, that I may show him kindness for Jonathan’s sake?”
KJV King James Version 1769
And David said, Is there yet any that is left of the house of Saul, that I may shew him kindness for Jonathan’s sake?
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And David said, Is there yet any that is left of the house of Saul, that I may show him kindness for Jonathan’s sake?
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And David saith, `Is there yet any left to the house of Saul, and I do with him kindness because of Jonathan?'
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And David said, Is there yet any that is left of the house of Saul, that I may shew him kindness for Jonathan's sake?
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And David said: Is there any one, think you, left of the house of Saul, that I may shew kindness to him for Jonathan's sake?
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y DIJO David: ¿ Ha quedado alguno de la casa de Saúl, á quien haga yo misericordia por amor de Jonathán?
E disse Davi: Restou algum da casa de Saul, a quem faça eu misericórdia por causa de Jônatas?
David dit: Reste-t-il encore quelqu’ un de la maison de Saül, pour que je lui fasse du bien à cause de Jonathan?
Und David sprach: Ist auch noch jemand übriggeblieben von dem Hause Sauls, daß ich Barmherzigkeit an ihm tue um Jonathans willen?
En David zeide: Is er nog iemand die overgebleven is van het huis van Saul, dat ik weldadigheid aan hem doe, om Jonathans wil?
E Davide disse: “Evvi egli rimasto alcuno della casa di Saul, a cui io possa far del bene per amore di Gionathan?”
Tedy rzekł Dawid: Jestże jeszcze kto, coby pozostał z domu Saulowego, abym uczynił nad nim miłosierdzie dla Jonatana?
И сказал Давид: не остался ли еще кто-нибудь из дома Саулова? я оказал бы ему милость ради Ионафана.
大衛 問說:「 掃羅 家 還 有 剩下 的人沒有?我要因 約拿單 的緣故向他 施 恩。」
And David said, Is there still anyone of Saul's family living, so that I may be a friend to him, because of Jonathan?
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · II Samuel 9:1
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree this verse records David's deliberate effort to honor the covenant he made with Jonathan in 1 Samuel 20:14, 17 and 1 Samuel 20:42. The Cambridge Bible notes that David acts 'in fulfilment of his oath to Jonathan.' The Hebrew noun chesed (H2617), translated 'kindness,' carries the weight of covenantal loyalty, not mere pity. Gill stresses that David's question was not aimed at destroying Saul's house, as eastern usurpers typically did, but at showing mercy for Jonathan's sake. Adam Clarke observes that David 'recollecting the covenant made with his friend, now inquires after his family.' Matthew Henry adds that David 'had too long forgotten his obligations to Jonathan, but now, at length, they are brought to his mind.' The timing, long after David was established, is explained by Gill as due to David's many wars and affairs, not neglect of covenant. The consensus sees this as an act of faithful love, grounded in an earlier promise and reflecting the 'kindness of God' (v. 3).
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: David is actively seeking a descendant of Saul to show loyal kindness in fulfillment of his covenant with Jonathan.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Motive for inquiry | David acts out of covenant loyalty to Jonathan, not political calculation. | Some interpreters (Gill) emphasize that David asked to prevent any suspicion of wanting to destroy Saul's house; others (Henry) suggest he had simply forgotten his duty until now. |
| Timing of the search | David waited until he was firmly established as king over all Israel. | Gill attributes the delay to David's long involvement in wars and government business. Henry implies neglect, calling it 'too long forgotten.' Others see it as a sovereignly timed moment after consolidation. |
| Scope of 'house of Saul' | David asks about any remaining member of the fallen dynasty. | Wesley argues David did not know Jonathan had a son, so he asked about Saul's house broadly. Gill and others assume David would have included Jonathan's descendants, but the question's wording is general. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of 2 Samuel 9 take place years after David became king over all Israel (2 Samuel 5). Chapter 8 recounts his military victories and the organization of his officials; only now does the narrative pause for a personal inquiry. Jamieson-Fausset-Brown note that Mephibosheth, Jonathan's son, was five years old when his father died, but by chapter 9 he has a young son of his own (v. 12), placing this scene perhaps twenty years later. The delay is not portrayed as neglect. Gill attributes it to David's long years of warfare and the press of government business.
In the ancient Near East, a new dynasty typically exterminated the previous royal house to prevent rebellion. David's 'house of Saul' question would have sounded ominous. But he clarifies his motive with 'for Jonathan's sake,' reversing the expected pattern of vengeance. The house of Saul had likely lost its land either to David as crown property (by conquest or marriage to Saul's daughter Michal) or to relatives after Saul's death. David's offer to restore that land and give Mephibosheth a place at the royal table was extraordinary, a public sign that the old enmity was ended.
Wesley notes that David asks of 'Saul's house' because he did not know that Jonathan had a son. Mephibosheth was obscure, living in Lo-debar, a town east of the Jordan, under the protection of a wealthy family. His lameness (2 Samuel 4:4) kept him from public life. David's inquiry, then, reaches beyond court politics; it is a search for a hidden heir of friendship.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant manuscript variants for 2 Samuel 9:1. The Hebrew text is stable across traditions, with minor differences in later translations (e.g., the insertion of 'think you' in the Douay-Rheims) that do not affect interpretation.
Reception History
This verse is most often read as a model of covenant faithfulness. Early Christian commentators, such as Augustine, saw in David's search for Jonathan's heir a type of God seeking lost humanity. During the Reformation, the emphasis fell on grace alone: Mephibosheth at the king's table was a picture of unmerited favor. In modern preaching, the passage is used to illustrate the character of God's kindness (chesed) and the call to remember our promises, especially to those who cannot repay us.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- David's Inquiry: After establishing his kingdom, David remembers his covenant with Jonathan and actively seeks a descendant to bless (v. 1).
- The Motive: David acts 'for Jonathan's sake,' showing that covenantal love outlasts political rivalry and personal danger.
- The Outcome: The search leads to Mephibosheth, unexpected, humble, lame, and David restores land and gives a place at the king's table (vv. 6, 7).
Five-point outline
- Remembered Promise: David's question flows from a covenant made years before (1 Samuel 20:14, 17).
- Timing of Grace: David waited until he was secure, not in neglect, but because circumstances had to be ready.
- The Kindness of God: In verse 3 David calls it 'the kindness of God', a love that reflects God's own character.
- The Hidden Heir: Mephibosheth is at Lo-debar, a place of obscurity and loss; David goes to find him.
- Restored Status: Mephibosheth receives land and a permanent seat at the king's table, reversing his exile and disability.
Illustration hooks
- A friend moves away after college; years later, when you have a stable job and home, you track them down to honor a promise you made to help them start a career.
- A church member quietly serving in a small group feels overlooked. Someone remembers their contribution and invites them to a leadership dinner, saying 'for your parents' sake, who were faithful here.'
- An adopted child grows up knowing the family's love was initiated long before they were chosen, a deliberate search.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why did David wait so long to fulfill his promise to Jonathan? Was it forgetfulness or wisdom?
- Does this story mean I should seek out people from my past to apologize or bless?
- How is God's kindness toward me like David's kindness to Mephibosheth?
Leading a Discussion
This passage invites us to consider how we keep promises when circumstances change. David had sworn to protect Jonathan's offspring (1 Samuel 20:14, 17), but years passed before he acted. As you work through the questions below, think about the covenants in your own life, and about God's faithfulness to us even when we feel like 'dead dogs' (v. 8).
Discussion questions
- What does David's question reveal about his priorities as king? Why did he ask about Saul's house at all?
- The Hebrew word chesed appears in verse 1. How is 'covenant loyalty' different from general kindness?
- David calls this 'the kindness of God' in verse 3. What does that phrase suggest about the source and nature of his action?
- Why might David have waited so long to make this inquiry? Is there a difference between a 'timely' promise and a 'delayed' one?
- Mephibosheth describes himself as a 'dead dog' (v. 8). How does his self-perception contrast with David's treatment of him?
- How does David's search for a descendant of Jonathan mirror God's search for us?
- What promises, to God or to others, might you need to revisit and fulfill, even if time has passed?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| I Samuel 18:1 | When he had finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. |
| I Samuel 18:4 | Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was on him and gave it to David with his clothing, even including his sword, his bow, and his sash. |
| I Samuel 20:14 | You shall not only show me the loving kindness of Yahweh while I still live, that I not die; |
| I Samuel 20:17 | Jonathan caused David to swear again, for the love that he had for him; for he loved him as he loved his own soul. |
| I Samuel 20:42 | Jonathan said to David, “Go in peace, because we have both sworn in Yahweh’s name, saying, ‘Yahweh is between me and you, and between my offspring and your offspring, forever.’” He arose and departed; and Jonathan went into the city. |
| I Samuel 23:16 | Jonathan, Saul’s son, arose and went to David into the woods, and strengthened his hand in God. |
| I Samuel 23:18 | They both made a covenant before Yahweh. Then David stayed in the woods and Jonathan went to his house. |
| II Samuel 1:26 | I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan. You have been very pleasant to me. Your love to me was wonderful, surpassing the love of women. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that David's inquiry about Jonathan's family was prompted by remembering their covenant, but political concerns had likely delayed it. He observes that reasons of state often override personal kindness and loyalty, even in a good king.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator notes that David's offer of kindness to any surviving member of Saul's family is not merely generosity but the fulfillment of a specific oath he swore to Jonathan. The action directly carries out the promise recorded earlier between the two friends.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
And Dauid sayde, Is there yet any man left of the house of Saul, that I may shew him mercie for Ionathans sake?
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill stresses that David asked about Saul's surviving family not from political fear but from a sincere desire to honor his covenant with Jonathan. He also argues against the idea that this happened early in David's reign, pointing out that Mephibosheth's having a young son shows it occurred long after David was securely established.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB explains that Mephibosheth's obscurity was not mainly due to his lameness but to an Eastern custom: the younger son of a reigning king outranks the son of a crown prince. So he was never considered a rival to his uncle Ish-bosheth, and David only learned of him through Ziba.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch define “the kindness of God” as love shown for God’s sake, not merely human generosity. They emphasize David’s “Fear not” was necessary because eastern usurpers typically killed a fallen king’s descendants. David’s restoration of Saul’s land and invitation to the royal table was thus an extraordinary act of godly covenant loyalty.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that the phrase "after this" does not indicate chronological sequence. Instead, it is a general transition formula, grouping David's wars thematically to show their place within the larger story of God's kingdom.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that David had long neglected his promise to Jonathan, yet he eventually remembered it. The point is a practical one: it is good to examine whether we have any unfulfilled commitments, and making them good late is still better than never.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley observes that David says "of Saul" rather than "of Jonathan" because David did not know Jonathan had a living son. He suggests Mephibosheth was young and obscure, possibly hidden by friends who feared David would eliminate any royal heirs, as princes commonly did.