2 Corinthians 3:11 Meaning: From Passing Glory to Abiding Glory
For if that which passes away was with glory, much more that which remains is in glory.
For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.
For if that which passeth away was with glory, much more that which remaineth is in glory.
for if that which is being made useless is through glory, much more that which is remaining is in glory.
For if that annulled [was introduced] with glory, much rather that which abides [subsists] in glory.
Meaning in one sentence
Paul contrasts the fading glory of the old covenant with the enduring glory of the new covenant in Christ.
Context
Paul is defending his ministry against teachers who insisted on keeping the law of Moses. In this chapter he sets the old covenant, given through Moses on Sinai, alongside the new covenant that comes through Christ. The old came with real glory: Moses’ face shone, the law was engraved by God’s own hand. But that glory was always fading, like light from a setting sun. Paul’s point is simple: if the temporary arrangement came wrapped in such splendor, how much more does the permanent one shine? This verse is the hinge of the argument. It names the difference not as good versus bad, but as passing versus abiding. And that changes everything about how Paul, and we, serve God.
Key Words
Two participles carry the weight of Paul’s argument. The first, katargoumenon (fading away), is a present passive participle: something that is in the process of being rendered inoperative. The law was never meant to stand forever; it was always on its way out, like scaffolding around a finished building. The second, menon (remaining), is also a present participle, but active, something that keeps on staying, with no expiration date. The new covenant doesn’t just last longer; it abides.
Then come the prepositions. For the old, Paul uses dia doxēs, glory as something it passed through, like a traveler moving on. For the new, en doxē, glory as the very element it lives in. The difference is between a splash of color and a permanent home. Paul chooses his words carefully so that we feel the shift: the first covenant was splendid but temporary; the second is splendid and permanent.
How Christians Read This Verse
Reformed commentators like Matthew Henry and Gill emphasize that the law’s glory was real but always designed to give way to something greater. Wesley and the Methodist tradition stress the ongoing life of the Spirit as that abiding glory. The Cambridge Bible notes that the different prepositions may express the same idea differently, but most agree Paul is highlighting a contrast in permanence. Catholic interpreters see in the abiding covenant the continued presence of Christ in the Church, while Orthodox readings often connect the enduring glory to the transformative power of the Holy Spirit in believers. Across traditions, the shared conviction is that what God does in Christ is not a temporary fix but a final, lasting work.
A common misunderstanding
Living This Out
Main takeaway: The gospel’s glory is not fading but permanent, because Christ and His Spirit remain forever.
For Families
For ages 5, 8
God gave the law with big, bright glory. But that glory was like a flashlight that turns off. Jesus brings a glory that stays on, like the sun. We can follow Jesus and never lose His light.
For ages 9, 12
Paul compares the old covenant, given through Moses, with the new covenant in Christ. The old had glory, like a fireworks show: amazing, but then gone. Paul says the new covenant’s glory is like a star that always shines. That’s because Jesus doesn’t just visit; He stays with us forever. So when things in life seem temporary or disappointing, remember: what God does in Christ will never fade.
Questions People Ask
Why does Paul use the words “passes away” for the old covenant?
Paul uses the Greek word katargoumenon, which means something in the process of being rendered inoperative. He is not saying the law was evil, but that it was designed to be temporary. It had a purpose, and that purpose was fulfilled in Christ.
What is the difference between “through glory” and “in glory”?
The preposition dia (through) suggests glory that accompanied the old covenant but was not permanent, like a passing visitor. En (in) means the new covenant lives and remains within glory as its natural home. The shift shows the gospel’s glory is not just added but essential.
Does this verse mean the Old Testament is no longer important for Christians?
No. Paul affirms the Old Testament had real glory and authority for its time. But as Hebrews 8:13 says, the old covenant is “near to vanishing away” because the new has come. Christians read the Old Testament as preparation for Christ, not as a binding system of law.
How can I experience the “abiding glory” Paul describes?
Paul connects this glory to the ministry of the Spirit in verse 8. The same Spirit who raised Jesus now lives in believers, transforming us into Christ’s image (2 Cor 3:18). Abiding glory is not a feeling but a relationship with Christ through the Spirit that grows and remains.
Was the law really given with glory?
Yes. Paul points to the glory on Moses’ face after receiving the law (Exodus 34). The giving of the law was accompanied by fire, thunder, and God’s visible presence. Paul is not downplaying that; he is magnifying the new covenant by comparison.
For pastors & researchers
Greek interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study