2 Chronicles 12:2 Meaning: Because They Trespassed
In the fifth year of King Rehoboam, Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem, because they had trespassed against Yahweh,
And it came to pass, that in the fifth year of king Rehoboam Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem, because they had transgressed against the Lord,
And it came to pass in the fifth year of king Rehoboam, that Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem, because they had trespassed against Jehovah,
And it cometh to pass, in the fifth year of king Rehoboam, come up hath Shishak king of Egypt against Jerusalem--because they trespassed against Jehovah--
And it came to pass in the fifth year of king Rehoboam, because they had transgressed against Jehovah, that Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem,
Meaning in one sentence
Why did Shishak invade Jerusalem? This verse reveals the Chronicler's view: unfaithfulness to God brings real consequences, yet hope remains.
Context
The Chronicler tells a story that moves from strength to collapse. Rehoboam had just established his kingdom and grown strong. Then he and all Israel abandoned God's law. The very next thing we read is that in the fifth year of his reign, Shishak king of Egypt marched against Jerusalem. The Chronicler does not leave us guessing about the connection. He names it plainly: 'because they had trespassed against Yahweh.' The rest of the chapter shows God sending the prophet Shemaiah to explain the discipline, and the king and leaders humbling themselves in response. This is not just history. It is a pattern of sin, consequence, and the offer of mercy that runs through the whole book.
Key Words
The Hebrew word behind 'trespassed' is ma'al. It carries the weight of a broken relationship. When someone acts treacherously within a covenant, a marriage, a treaty, a pledge, that is ma'al. It is not a simple slip. It is a deliberate breach of trust. The people of God had abandoned the One who rescued them and turned to other gods. The Targum, an ancient Aramaic paraphrase, renders it 'against the Word of the Lord.' That phrase ties the trespass directly to God's revealed will. The verb 'came up' (alah) is the same word used for going up to worship. Here it describes an enemy army ascending toward Jerusalem. The contrast is sharp: what should have been a journey of worship became a march of judgment. The Chronicler uses these ordinary words to show that unfaithfulness has a weight, and that weight brings real consequences.
How Christians Read This Verse
Christians across traditions have read this verse as a clear example of the Chronicler's theology: God responds to disobedience with immediate discipline. Matthew Henry calls it a 'speedy punishment' for apostasy. The Cambridge Bible notes that seeing temporal rewards and punishments is 'characteristic of the Chronicler.' Barnes adds that while Shishak's own motives were political, the biblical writer interprets the invasion from God's point of view. Keil and Delitzsch highlight that the invasion was 'in punishment of this defection.' None of these commentators minimize the historical reality of the invasion or Shishak's ambition. They simply affirm that behind the earthly army stood a divine hand, and that hand moved because a covenant had been broken.
A common misunderstanding
Some read this verse and assume that every difficulty in their life is a direct punishment for a specific sin. In fact, the Chronicler links this invasion to a period of national, sustained unfaithfulness. He is not giving a universal formula for suffering. The same chapter records that when the leaders humbled themselves, God relented from total destruction. The verse teaches that covenant breaking invites discipline, but it does not say every hardship is a one-to-one penalty for a particular wrong.
Living This Out
This verse does not ask you to search your past for every mistake. It asks you to look at the direction of your life. Are you drifting away from God's ways, little by little? The Chronicler shows that small abandonments can lead to big consequences. This week, you might ask yourself: where have I assumed God's grace will cover a pattern I am not willing to change? Then remember that the same God who allowed the invasion also sent the prophet. He wants you to turn around, not to stay crushed. Take one honest look, and then come back.
Main takeaway: Our unfaithfulness to God has real costs, but He always sends a way back to Him.
For Families
For ages 5, 8
God’s people stopped obeying Him. So God let a king from Egypt attack them. But God still wanted them to say sorry and come back to Him.
For ages 9, 12
When Rehoboam and the people turned away from God, they thought they were safe because Jerusalem had strong walls. But God allowed Shishak’s army to attack, and they took the gold shields from the temple. The real problem wasn’t the army, it was their broken promise to God. The good news is that when they humbled themselves, God stopped the destruction. He always leaves a door open for repentance.
Questions People Ask
Who was Shishak, and why did he attack Jerusalem?
Shishak was the first king of Egypt's 22nd dynasty, also known as Sheshonk I. He attacked Jerusalem in the fifth year of Rehoboam's reign. The Bible says he came because the people had trespassed against the Lord, but historians note that Shishak also wanted to expand his influence and help Jeroboam, who had fled to Egypt earlier.
What does it mean to 'trespass' or 'transgress' against the Lord in this verse?
The Hebrew word is ma'al, which means to act unfaithfully or treacherously in a covenant relationship. It is stronger than a simple mistake. It implies a deliberate betrayal of trust, like a spouse being unfaithful. Here it refers to the people abandoning God's law and worshiping other gods.
Does this verse teach that every bad event is a direct punishment for sin?
Not exactly. The Chronicler shows a specific connection between national apostasy and this invasion, but the broader Bible teaches that suffering has many causes: the fallen world, other people's choices, spiritual attack, and sometimes discipline. This verse should not be used to interpret every hardship as a one-to-one punishment. The same chapter shows God's mercy when the people repent.
What happened after Rehoboam and the leaders humbled themselves?
According to 2 Chronicles 12:6-7, when the king and the princes humbled themselves and said 'The Lord is righteous,' God sent word through the prophet Shemaiah that He would not destroy them completely. They would still become servants to Shishak, but God granted them some deliverance and did not pour out His full wrath on Jerusalem.
How is this verse different from the version in 1 Kings 14?
In 1 Kings 14:25-26, the invasion is mentioned briefly without the explicit 'because they had trespassed.' The Chronicler adds the theological interpretation, showing his concern with explaining why events happened in terms of covenant faithfulness and divine retribution. Both accounts are historical, but the Chronicler highlights the cause-and-effect relationship with God's justice.
For pastors & researchers
Hebrew interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study