I Thessalonians 5:26 · Bible study
1 Thessalonians 5:26 Commentary: A Holy Kiss
Greek · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore the cultural context and modern application of Paul's command to greet with a holy kiss in 1 Thessalonians 5:26.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Paul commands a concrete, public, affectionate greeting as a seal of Christian fellowship.
- Key words: aspazomai (to greet), philema (kiss, related to brotherly love), hagios (set apart, holy).
- Main debate: Whether the command requires a literal kiss or can be adapted to other culturally appropriate gestures.
- Theological theme: The unity and mutual love of the body of Christ, expressed visibly.
- Best use: A call to examine how our church greetings reflect genuine, holy affection for all believers.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Greet all the brothers with a holy kiss.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Greet all the brothers with a holy kiss.
KJV King James Version 1769
Greet all the brethren with an holy kiss.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Salute all the brethren with a holy kiss.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
salute all the brethren in an holy kiss;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Greet all the brethren with a holy kiss.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Salute all the brethren with a holy kiss.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Saludad á todos los hermanos en ósculo santo.
Saudai a todos os irmãos com beijo santo.
Saluez tous les frères par un saint baiser.
Grüßet alle Brüder mit dem heiligen Kuß.
Groet al de broeders met een heiligen kus.
Salutate tutti i fratelli con un santo bacio.
Pozdrówcie braci wszystkich z pocałowaniem świętem.
Приветствуйте всех братьев лобзанием святым.
與眾 弟兄 親嘴 問安, 務要聖潔。
Give all the brothers a holy kiss.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · I Thessalonians 5:26
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
The command to “greet all the brothers with a holy kiss” was not a metaphor. Commentators agree it was a literal, customary gesture of affection practiced in the early church. Gill describes it as “a token of Christian love and fellowship,” set in opposition to an unchaste or hypocritical kiss. Vincent notes that the Greek word philema carries the sense of a love-token, and the adjective hagios (holy) marks it as distinct from common greetings. The aorist imperative aspasasthe signals a public, concrete action to be carried out when the epistle was read. Cambridge Bible says the kiss was “universal in the primitive Christian assemblies” and remains the usage of Eastern churches. Calvin and Barnes treat it as a natural expression of affection toward all the saints. The consensus is clear: the command is literal, but its cultural form is not timeless, the heart of the command is warm, pure, brotherly love expressed in a fitting way.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Literal command view: The early church consistently practiced a literal kiss of peace, as attested by Justin Martyr, Tertullian, and Eastern liturgical tradition. The Greek term is concrete and the imperative is clear.
- Cultural adaptation view: The kiss was a first-century greeting; Paul sanctified an existing custom. The principle of affectionate greeting endures, but the form may change (handshake, hug, bow) depending on culture (Barnes, Calvin, Cambridge Bible).
- Symbolic affection view: The command primarily emphasizes heart-level love and unity, and the physical act is secondary. The adjective 'holy' points to the quality of the greeting rather than the gesture itself.
What is clear: Paul commands believers to greet one another with genuine, pure, and holy affection, expressed in a way that visibly demonstrates their unity in Christ.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Literal vs adapted practice | All Christians agree the verse commands genuine, holy love among believers. | Some traditions (Eastern Orthodox, Oriental) continue the literal kiss of peace in liturgy; others adapt the gesture to a handshake, hug, or greeting of peace, arguing the form is culturally relative. |
| Whom to greet (all brothers) | The greeting is for all believers, not a select few. | The extent of 'all' is agreed; the debate lies in how to include everyone practically without causing discomfort or crossing boundaries. |
| Nature of 'holy' | The greeting must be pure, chaste, and set apart from worldly or sensual affection. | How to ensure holiness while maintaining warmth is a pastoral challenge, with different approaches on physical contact between men and women in church settings. |
| Physical affection in church | Physical touch can express Christian love, but must be appropriate. | Some churches emphasize touch (hugs, holding hands) as biblical warmth; others stress caution to avoid confusion or offense, especially in cultures with strict personal space norms. |
Historical & Cultural Context
In the first-century Mediterranean world, a kiss on the cheek was a standard greeting among family and close friends. Jewish culture used it as a sign of peace and reconciliation (see Luke 7:45, Acts 20:37). Greek and Roman societies also practiced the kiss in both public and private settings. The early Christian church adopted this gesture but infused it with new meaning: it became a symbol of the spiritual kinship believers shared in Christ.
The kiss found a natural home in Christian worship. Justin Martyr, writing in the mid-second century, describes it as part of the liturgy before the Eucharist. By the time of Tertullian, it was called the osculum pacis (kiss of peace) and was omitted on Good Friday due to Judas’s betrayal. Early church councils regulated the practice to prevent abuse, men kissed men, women kissed women, to protect against suspicion and guard holiness.
In the epistle itself, verse 26 sits within Paul’s closing remarks. He has just asked for prayer (v. 25), then commands a public greeting that would be enacted as the letter was read aloud. Verse 27 solemnly charges that the letter be read to all the holy brothers, so the kiss likely followed that reading, a visible seal of the fellowship Paul had written to strengthen. The imperative “greet all the brothers” uses the aorist tense, pointing to a single, concrete action at that moment. The preposition en (“with a holy kiss”) denotes the instrument of greeting. This is not an abstract idea; it is embodied love.
The cultural form of the kiss changed over time and place. In the Western church it gradually faded by the Middle Ages, replaced by a handshake or bow. Eastern Orthodox and Oriental churches still use the kiss of peace during the Divine Liturgy. Paul’s command thus raises a question for every generation: how do we embody the same holy affection when our culture no longer shares that gesture?
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants in the Greek manuscripts for 1 Thessalonians 5:26. Adam Clarke mentions that the Coptic version reads “greet one another” instead of “all the brothers,” but this reading is not supported by the major Greek manuscripts cited by Griesbach and Wetstein. The standard Greek text is stable: aspasasthe tous adelphous pantas en philemati hagiō.
Reception History
In the early church, the holy kiss was a regular part of worship. Justin Martyr described it in the second century as occurring after prayers and before the Eucharist. Tertullian called it the “sign of peace” and noted it was omitted on Good Friday. The practice spread throughout the Eastern churches, where it remains today at Easter and in the Divine Liturgy. In the medieval Western church, the kiss gradually disappeared, replaced by a gesture of peace or a handshake. Reformation commentators like Calvin and Matthew Henry treated it as a cultural expression of brotherly love, not a binding ceremony. Modern Western churches generally do not practice the literal kiss, but many have adopted a “passing of the peace” that echoes the same spirit. The verse continues to challenge Christians to ask how they can embody sincere, holy affection for one another in a way that their culture will understand.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The command is inclusive. Paul says “all the brothers.” No exceptions, no factions. The greeting was to cross every social and personal boundary within the church.
- The touch is holy. The kiss is hagios, set apart, pure, distinct from worldly or sensual affection. It belongs to the family of God.
- The gesture points beyond itself. The physical kiss expressed spiritual reality: unity in Christ. It was a sign of the love that binds the body together.
Five-point outline
- Context matters. The kiss was a normal greeting in the first-century East. Paul did not invent it; he sanctified it.
- Paul takes the initiative. He does not say “kiss one another” (as in Romans 16:16, 1 Corinthians 16:20). He says “greet all the brothers”, the elders or readers were to extend his greeting through a kiss, making it personal.
- Holiness guards against abuse. Early church rules separated men and women during the kiss. The adjective “holy” protects the gesture from becoming a pretext.
- No brother is left out. “All” includes the weak, the marginal, the difficult. The kiss was a low-barrier way to include everyone.
- The command remains; the form can adapt. The principle is mutual affection expressed in a culturally appropriate, sexually pure, and genuinely warm way.
Illustration hooks
- A handshake can be hollow. Many churchgoers shake hands every Sunday without actually knowing each other. Paul’s command invites us to upgrade the greeting from a bare form to a real exchange of love.
- Cultural calibrations. In some countries, a kiss on both cheeks is routine. In others, a hug or a pat on the back is the norm. The challenge is to find our culture’s equivalent and fill it with the same holiness.
- The wedding toast principle. A toast is a public sign of honor. The kiss was a public sign of belonging. When we greet one another warmly, we are toasting each other as family.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Do we have to kiss each other literally? If not, what replaces it?
- How do I show holy affection without making someone uncomfortable?
- Why does the Bible spend time on a greeting? Is this really that important?
Leading a Discussion
Paul’s closing instruction seems simple: greet with a holy kiss. But behind it lies a deep conviction, the church is a family, and family touches. This short discussion helps your group think about how we express love in ways that are both genuine and appropriate.
Discussion questions
- Read 1 Thessalonians 5:26 aloud. What stands out to you about this verse?
- What do we learn from the cross-references (Romans 16:16, 1 Corinthians 16:20, 1 Peter 5:14) about how the early church greeted each other?
- Why do you think Paul adds the word “holy” to the kiss? What difference does that adjective make?
- In verse 27 he charges them to read the letter to all the brothers. How does the kiss connect to the reading of Scripture?
- If the physical kiss is no longer our custom, what are modern equivalents that carry the same warmth and holiness?
- How can a simple greeting become a genuine expression of Christian love rather than a routine?
- Think of one person in your church family you find hard to greet warmly. What would it look like to extend Paul’s command to them this week?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Romans 16:16 | Greet one another with a holy kiss. The assemblies of Christ greet you. |
| I Corinthians 16:20 | All the brothers greet you. Greet one another with a holy kiss. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Greet all the brethren - See the note on Rom 16:16 . Instead of all the brethren, the Coptic has, greet one another; a reading not noticed by either Griesbach or Wetstein.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes does not offer fresh commentary on this greeting; instead he directs the reader to his earlier notes on Romans 16:16, where he discusses the holy kiss. His treatment of the current verse is thus a cross-reference, assuming the earlier explanation covers the meaning and practice sufficiently.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin notes that the holy kiss was simply a customary greeting in that culture, not a new Christian rite. He points out that Paul commands it to declare his affection for all the saints, using a familiar social gesture to express brotherly love.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator notes that the holy kiss was a universal sign of affection in early Christian assemblies, still practiced in Eastern churches today. Paul wanted this gesture exchanged by everyone present at the reading of his letter as a tangible expression of his love for each member of the congregation.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
Greete all the brethren with an holy kisse.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill distinguishes the holy kiss as the opposite of both an unchaste and a hypocritical greeting. His point is that Paul urges this gesture as a sincere expression of brotherly love, meant to stir the church to deepen their mutual affection for one another.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB explains that the holy kiss was a pure and chaste gesture of Christian fellowship, a common mode of greeting in many cultures. This practice later became part of early church worship during holy communion, where men greeted men and women greeted women in the Lord.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that Paul addresses the "God of peace" because unity and holiness flow from God as the author of peace. He prays for complete sanctification, which is progressive and only partial in this life, and for preservation of the whole person until Christ returns.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Kiss. See on 2 Co 13:12 . Comp. Rom 16:16 ; 1 Co 16:20 ; 1 Pe 5:14 .