GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Ezra 4:7-16 Meaning: Artaxerxes and the Aramaic Letter

7In the days of Artaxerxes, Bishlam, Mithredath, Tabeel, and the rest of his companions wrote to Artaxerxes king of Persia; and the writing of the letter was written in Syrian and delivered in the Syrian language.

8Rehum the chancellor and Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter against Jerusalem to Artaxerxes the king as follows.

9Then Rehum the chancellor, Shimshai the scribe, and the rest of their companions, the Dinaites, and the Apharsathchites, the Tarpelites, the Apharsites, the Archevites, the Babylonians, the Shushanchites, the Dehaites, the Elamites,

10and the rest of the nations whom the great and noble Osnappar brought over and settled in the city of Samaria, and in the rest of the country beyond the River, and so forth, wrote.

11This is the copy of the letter that they sent: To King Artaxerxes, from your servants, the people beyond the River.

12Be it known to the king that the Jews who came up from you have come to us to Jerusalem. They are building the rebellious and bad city, and have finished the walls and repaired the foundations.

13Be it known now to the king that if this city is built and the walls finished, they will not pay tribute, custom, or toll, and in the end it will be hurtful to the kings.

14Now because we eat the salt of the palace and it is not appropriate for us to see the king’s dishonor, therefore we have sent and informed the king,

15that search may be made in the book of the records of your fathers. You will see in the book of the records, and know that this city is a rebellious city, and hurtful to kings and provinces, and that they have started rebellions within it in the past. That is why this city was destroyed.

16We inform the king that if this city is built and the walls finished, then you will have no possession beyond the River.

Meaning in one sentence

A letter written in Aramaic to King Artaxerxes accuses the Jews of rebuilding rebellious Jerusalem, aiming to stop the work.

Ezra Old Testament Hebrew

Context

Ezra 4 records the opposition that met the returning exiles when they began rebuilding the temple. Verses 1, 5 describe earlier harassment, but here the enemies take a formal approach. They draft a letter to the Persian king, written in Aramaic the diplomatic language of the empire. The letter comes from officials living in Samaria, a region whose population had been resettled by Assyrian kings. They accuse the Jews of rebuilding Jerusalem, calling it a rebellious city that has historically harmed kings. The claim is designed to provoke the king into halting the work. The passage preserves the actual text of that letter, giving readers a raw look at how organized opposition works against God's people.

Key Words

Three words carry the weight of this passage. The first is letter (igrāh, H0104). This is more than a casual note. It is an official written accusation sent to the royal court. The word reminds us that opposition to God's work often comes through organized, documented channels. The second phrase is we have maintenance from the king's palace (literally “we are salted with the salt of the palace”). In the ancient world, eating a person's salt meant you owed them loyalty. The officials are saying, 'Our livelihood depends on the king, so we must protect his interests.' It reveals a heart motivated by fear of losing position. The third word is rebellious (mārād, H4779). It is the same root used for revolt. The enemies paint Jerusalem as a city of defiance, but the Jews were simply obeying Cyrus's decree. These words together show how self-interest and half-truths are often used to stop what God has started.

How Christians Read This Verse

Christians across traditions have differed on the identity of King Artaxerxes here. Some, like Adam Clarke and Matthew Henry, see him as Cambyses, the son of Cyrus. Others, following Barnes and the Cambridge Bible, identify him as the usurper Pseudo-Smerdis (Gomates), who reigned only seven months. Still others place the letter later, under Artaxerxes I Longimanus. The precise historical identity matters less than the pattern: opposition to God's people spanned multiple reigns. The note that the letter was written in Aramaic also highlights the wide use of that language in Persian administration. Many readers see in this passage a reminder that God's work is often met with political and legal schemes, yet He remains sovereign over human rulers.

A common misunderstanding

A common misreading is to take the enemies' description of Jerusalem as a fair report. The letter calls the city “rebellious and bad” as if it were a neutral fact. In fact, the accusation is propaganda. The city had been destroyed earlier because of its rebellion against Babylon, but the current rebuilding was authorized by the Persian king Cyrus. The letter twists history, omits the royal decree, and exaggerates the threat. In the same way, opposition today often mixes truth with distortion to stop good work.

Living This Out

This week you may find yourself or your church misrepresented. Someone might take a past failure and use it to question your present work. The officials in this passage did not start a direct fight; they went through official channels with a carefully worded lie. When that happens, you do not have to panic or immediately defend yourself. You can keep building what God called you to build. Also, examine your own motives. The phrase “we eat the salt of the palace” shows loyalty tied to personal benefit. Are you serving God for what you get, or because He is worthy? Let your loyalty be to God alone, not to the approval of any human power.

Main takeaway: God's work often faces slander and political schemes, but no human accusation can stop what He has decreed.

For Families

For ages 5, 8

Some people sent a letter full of wrong things about God's people. They said Jerusalem was a bad city. But God's people kept working because they trusted God.

For ages 9, 12

The enemies of the Jews wrote a letter to the king. They said Jerusalem was dangerous and would stop paying taxes. They were afraid the Jews would become strong. The letter was partly true about the city's history but unfair because the Jews were only following God's command. The story teaches us that people sometimes twist the truth to stop God's work.

Questions People Ask

Why was the letter written in Aramaic?

Aramaic was the common language of diplomacy in the Persian Empire. Writing the letter in Aramaic meant the king's officials could read it immediately without translation. It also shows that the text of Ezra transitions from Hebrew to Aramaic for official correspondence, continuing through Ezra 6:18.

Who was Artaxerxes in this passage?

Scholars are not agreed. Some identify him as Cambyses, the son of Cyrus. Others think he was the usurper Pseudo-Smerdis, who ruled for seven months in 521 BC. The exact identity is less important than the pattern of opposition across several Persian kings, each called by a similar title.

What does 'we eat the salt of the palace' mean?

In the ancient Near East, eating someone's salt meant accepting their hospitality and owing them loyalty. The officials are saying, 'Our salaries come from the king, so we must protect his interests.' It reveals that their accusation was motivated by fear of losing their own positions.

Was Jerusalem really a rebellious city?

The city had a history of rebellion against empires like Babylon, which led to its destruction. However, the Jews were not rebelling against Persia; they were rebuilding under a decree from Cyrus. The letter uses a true past fact to make a false accusation about the present.

How does this letter fit with the rest of Ezra 4?

Ezra 4 shows opposition across three reigns. Verses 1-5 describe earlier harassment during Cyrus's reign. Verse 6 mentions a letter under Ahasuerus (Xerxes). Verses 7-16 are the longest example, a letter under Artaxerxes. Each attempt aimed to stop the temple work, but God's plan continued.

For pastors & researchers

Hebrew interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study

Study page →